Kol Yisrael Bnei Malachim Hem
Shtait in the last Mishna in the 14th Perek of Shabbos that we cannot apply a certain type of oil on Shabbos since it is usually used for a medicine, but Bnei Malachim can use it on Shabbos because they regularly use it as a bath. A Tanna then comments that we can all use it because "Kol Yisrael Bnei Malachim Hem."
Such a comment is not unique to Chazal - a congruent comment exists by Heseiba on Pesach where the Gemara says that Women don't require Heseiba but a Chashuv women does. The Ba'al HaTurim in quoting that Halacha says "Kol Hanashim Shelano Chashuvot Hem."
More so by the case in Shabbos, I wonder about the Halachic motivation of the authors of such statements. In the Pesachim example, perhaps, nowadays all women are chashuv which warrants requiring Heseiba, however, in the Shabbos example, how are we to understand that only "Kol Yisrael" are now Bnei Malachim? If the Tanna had stated that everyone now is Bnei Malachim, as the Tur did, then I would take the statement at face value. But are we to assume that only Yisrael now use that oil as a bath and the Umos Ha'Olam do not?
It is clear that the Tanna has something besides the topical Halachic implications in mind by stating "Kol Yisrael" instead of "Kulanu."
Read the full Chiddush...

